Ответы в темах

Просмотр 10 сообщений - с 1 по 10 (из 10 всего)
  • Автор
    Сообщения
  • в ответ на: Group 3 #363682
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    Thanks for the tourney guys, specially to V_M for organizing this. I had fun playing it. Cheers.

    в ответ на: Discussion of the rules #363565
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    Hello everyone,
    when are the groups of 2 Round available? When is second round starting and ending (deadline)?
    Cheers,
    Vlixes

    в ответ на: Group 3 #363540
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    @Silverwind 117374 wrote:

    I have 13 points now, not 10. I think you have missed my 1-0 victory vs Vlixes.

    No, they are right: You have sent 3 victories and 1 lose = 10 points. They are not counting my 1 point lose, that’s all.

    в ответ на: Group 3 #363501
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    I won Minot

    в ответ на: Group 3 #363459
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    I won Dark Admiral

    в ответ на: Group 3 #363379
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    I won vs Prokratius.

    в ответ на: Discussion of the rules #363270
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    @cheremis 117037 wrote:

    Rome is one of the richest fractions foot swordsman . And they are the main force in the game (so that we do not increase the number of swordsmen on foot for Rome ) , we even wanted to reduce them .

    Рим одна из богатейших фракций по пешим мечникам . А они являются основной силой в игре (так что мы не будем увеличивать количество пеших мечников для Рима) , мы даже хотели их сократить .

    That’s why I’m proposing limiting Rome to Eras: polybian, early imperial and late imperial.

    Also, your rules mean that a Roman player can only bring 8 melee infantry and the rest is cheap auxilia or cavalry. I don’t like your rules because their are not reflecting Rome as a faction. In fact, you are nerfing Rome, not balancing Rome.

    I think Rome deserves more liberty regarding sword infantry.

    в ответ на: Discussion of the rules #363248
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    Hello guys,
    I found restrictive the rules for any roman player. Rome was about melee infantry. I think you should make an exception with Rome. It had available more melee infantry than any other faction in the ancient world and the roster shows that. If you put such limits to melee infantry, then Rome will be a comic faction to see and somewhat weak (at least no appealing to play with). Also the 6 same max rule should be discarded for Rome. Legions were available in great numbers. With that rule you could force the player to mix differente melee infantry.
    If you decide to make Rome an exception to those infantry rules, I propose to balance Rome in another way. We can limit the number of evocati (say, 2 max) and limit unit roster to eras: polybian, early imperial and late imperial. This makes more sense for me as fair faction balancing.

    в ответ на: Registration / Регистрация #363184
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    Hello guys, sorry for the inconvenient, but I have changed my name to {V.O.D}_Vlixes But my data is the same as posted before.
    Cheers.

    в ответ на: Registration / Регистрация #363145
    V.O.D_Quetzalcoatl
    Участник

    1.-Vlixes
    2.-V.O.D
    3.-http://steamcommunity.com/id/vodquetzalcoatl
    4.—5
    5.-All except daughters of mars

Просмотр 10 сообщений - с 1 по 10 (из 10 всего)