Ответы в темах

Просмотр 15 сообщений - с 1 по 15 (из 35 всего)
  • Автор
    Сообщения
  • в ответ на: Group 3 #363679
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    I won vs vlixes

    в ответ на: Group 4 #363502
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    @Asseror 117334 wrote:

    Yeah it’s your victory

    ok thanks

    also Diplomatt :Sparta: 1-0 Kirito :luzitani:

    в ответ на: Group 4 #363499
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    i played vs Giamilkara but it was late and he was running away for ages with 2 units and I told him I had to go but he didnt respond.

    Here is the screenshot of the end of the game I feel that I clearly had the victory http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=448578838

    в ответ на: Group 4 #363359
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    I won vs trajan

    в ответ на: Discussion of the rules #363214
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    Don’t have to make limit smaller just ban noob box

    в ответ на: Registration / Регистрация #363157
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    Diplomatt
    WOLF
    GMT +1
    http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198019070908/
    all DLC apart from Black Sea

    в ответ на: Discussion of the rules #363122
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    max 8 swords makes it decently balanced for most factions, even massalia and ardeai can do ok (however theyre still weaker than the barbarians.

    A number of factions need a buff of some sort — the ones that first come to mind are iceni and macedon

    в ответ на: Group 3 | Группа 3 #362575
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    @ThePrussianPrince 116297 wrote:

    At the end of the day, this tournament is not meant to be balanced anyway, and that’s because of one single fact: you have a faction that is randomly selected for you at the beginning of tournament. It’s just a fun and unique tournament in my opinion, but because of that faction rule I can’t really take it too seriously. I don’t mean that in a bad way.

    I know what you mean but you do take it seriously when there’s a prize

    в ответ на: Group 3 | Группа 3 #362560
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    @William/Kaszanka 116286 wrote:

    I think rules are ok. But nvm.

    Obviously when you have Jutes and Nordic Horse that beat Noble Germanic

    в ответ на: Group 4 | Группа 4 #362494
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    lost vs olkimos and dark admiral

    в ответ на: Group 4 | Группа 4 #362458
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    I won vs Lurtz (Visigoths)

    в ответ на: Вопросы / Questions #362383
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    This is why you should had left it for a few days before you started the round. Hard to make judgements straight away on a unit.

    в ответ на: Вопросы / Questions #362374
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    @ZEGAN 116090 wrote:

    PLZ more Alani players raging about it.
    I was playing ERE without Tagmati for 2 rounds and it was ok. You have Alani shock which is OP, you have slingers, crossbows, agathirseans, so what is wrong with u, dudes?

    There is a difference between raging and then providing arguments backed up with facts. Most factions have all the other units, they’re not relevant, we are talking about melee cav.

    в ответ на: Вопросы / Questions #362360
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    So Noble Alani cav gets banned because it beats cav that’s more expensive but Nordic Horse Lords that cost 700 can beat Noble Germanic Horse that cost 750 and thats ok?

    в ответ на: Group 1 | Группа 1 #362355
    Diplomatt
    Участник

    @cheremis 116080 wrote:

    Думаю поступлю как Дипломат в соседней теме =)
    I don’t want to play until near the end of the deadline so I can get used to the new patch. I will maybe start my games on the 2nd or 3rd

    Hey stop copying off me :P

Просмотр 15 сообщений - с 1 по 15 (из 35 всего)